About the Author

Snark Twain is the unacknowledged, uncrowned, pound-for-pound, heavyweight champion writer of the world. He is also extremely modest. He lives in San Francisco with his trophy wife and two cats more beautiful than your children. You can read more of his work, published under the pseudonym Allan Goldstein, on his website, allangoldstein.com.

See All Posts by This Author

No, you can’t

Email This Post Email This Post - Print This Post Print This Post -

For Barack Obama, the easy part is over. Dealing with the rednecks, racists and right-wing dead-enders was duck soup compared to what’s coming now. While we were engaged in pleasant diversions like debating health care reform and financial re-regulation real trouble was brewing overseas.

Our new president came into office with a vision of the future and a long to-do list that the previous administration had either badly botched or sorely neglected. He knew what he wanted to spend his political capital on, he knew the approximate direction he wanted to take the country, he thought he had an idea of the history he was going to make.

He is about to be overtaken by events. The anvil that will forge or crush his presidency isn’t going to be the town halls or the blogosphere, it won’t be in congress or the Supreme Court. It will be, once again, thousands of miles away, where reckless men are making desperate bets with the lives of millions. It will be, once again, a dozen little fires, threatening to burst into a firestorm, that test his steel and define his legacy, as it did to FDR and JFK and LBJ before him.

Iran wants a bomb, Israel wants to bomb Iran, Bin Laden wants his audiotaped fantasies to become fatal realities, homegrown Jihadists with homebrew explosives want to kill, kill, kill.

Will Afghanistan become a playground for Al Qaeda again, is it a war to win or a quagmire to avoid? What do we do if Iran goes critical, if Pakistan explodes into civil war, if Moscow sends the tanks into Georgia, if a ship full of North Korean missile parts sails for Yemen?

Those are the stark choices that are rushing to confront our president right now, at an ever-accelerating speed. He is the man who must decide, do we go all in, is it just a bluff, can we let things happen and live with the consequences? Will Iran get the bomb, will they use it, will Israel wait quietly to find out, will Russia and China help with sanctions or pick up the pieces after we break ourselves in a war that costs them nothing?

We have a most reasonable president who now has to deal with a scarily unreasonable world. This is his test and it’s not the one he was looking for. The 3 AM telephone is ringing off the hook. What does he say when he picks it up?

“Yes, we can.” There is still power in those words. The honeymoon is over, but the dream is alive, and Obama has more people believing than not. It will take time, but we’re only ten months into an eight year presidency, he has time. I have no doubt that Obama means it when he says, “Yes, we can.”

But there are forces afoot in the world that can turn it all to dust, if left unchecked. From Tehran to Times Square, nihilists, dictators, fundamentalists, crazies and crazies like a fox are weaving nightmares and hatching plans that would shatter our beautiful hopes for a better, more compassionate world and paint it red with blood.

Obama came into power with grand ideas and many plans, as only the best leaders do. He was going to bend the future to his will, as only the strongest leaders can. He is trying mightily to rouse us from our gridlocked doldrums and get us moving forward again. Obama is a moderate by temperament and a progressive by aim, but a realist above all. He knows that progress is a ratchet, you make history by moving forward, click by click. Little victories adding up to big changes, that’s how history is made. Obama knows that and he’s doing it, through all the noise and turmoil and resistance he’s pushing forward, pressing the agenda. When the dust clears and the naysayers have screamed themselves mute, we’ll be further along than we are today. Obama will have made history.

But it’s not just about the history you make. Sometimes it’s about the history you prevent. Sometimes the measure of the man is to stand athwart history and shout “halt!”

The horizon is growing dark, you’d have to be blind not to see that. Obama is not blind. And now we’re going to find out if he knows how to say the words that are not in his nature, and make them stick. “No, you can’t.”

There Are 3 Responses So Far. »

  1. Snark: Obama adopted his “good war” in Afghanistan and is ducking his resposnbilities now while marines are ducking bullets with not enough hands to tie behind their backs. Like the bumper stickers are saying, “FIGHT TO WIN: Or Get Em’ Out.”

  2. Hey Mr. Snark, long time, no talk. I have to admit your article was a little overwhelming. I had no idea you were such an Obama fan. As far as Afghanistan goes, I see no difference between Obama’s war and Bush’s in Iraq. Could you explain to me what we have to gain in Afghanistan?

    Even though the preemptive incursion into Iraq was a mistake, given intelligence by a plethora of sources; England, Russia, Germany, etc., the outcome was at least quixotic. And make no mistake about it, I’m not condoning the action. I was against it in the begining and I’m against it now. My point is, Obama is fighting a fight that cannot be won. There is no infrastructure, no industry, no education, and the people do not want freedom as the Iraqis did. So, why does Obama insist on staying in Afghanistan? I’ll tell you.

    It’s kinda like Kenwood says. People and nations alike are controlled by money, and wars cost money. There are greater powers in the world than Mr. Obama. Yes, I know he’s egotistical. Sure, he’s narcissistic. But looking out for the good of America? Are you sure?

    Read my post “How Much More Change Can We Stand” and you will see what I’m talking about.

  3. My-my Kenwood, sounds like you’re talking about technocracy. I hate to inform you, but it wasn’t very well received in the late twenties or early thirties and all but died. I seriously doubt it would be accepted with open arms in the fast growing, progressive soiciety we live in today, Deo gratias.

Post a Response

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image